PUBLIC VIEWPOINTS

David Gifford

Source interview participant

1 sources · 1 viewpoints · 1 topics

Content updated:

David Gifford on Exact deletion method for influence testing. Explore 1 viewpoint by topic, with evidence from 1 source.

Explore connections

Viewpoints by topic

Attributed viewpoints, ordered by source publication date. A snapshot of these conversations, not a definitive statement of someone’s beliefs.

Translations are for reading; original excerpts remain the evidence.

Exact deletion method for influence testing

View this topic

Gifford describes deleting training inputs and their influence

David Gifford describes the paper’s method as deleting training inputs and all their influence. He says it enables efficient, large-scale deletion and shows that the results do not change.

Supporting evidence

When AI art has no author: MIT study finds generated images often can't be traced to any training data | MIT CSAIL

Original excerpt

This paper introduces the first method that is absolute. You're actually deleting the inputs and deleting all influences of the inputs.
Context

"They really could not absolutely show that deleting individual things did not change the output. This is the first exact method for doing large-scale deletion efficiently and showing that the results don't change."

Statements by source date1

Statements are ordered by the original source publication date; differences in wording do not establish a change of position.