A TOPIC, IN CONTEXT

workflow integration rationale

Judgments in this source concerning workflow integration rationale. Explore 1 viewpoint with evidence from 1 source.

1 people · 1 sources · 1 viewpoints

Content updated:

Explore connections ↗

Viewpoint map

Explore by person. Select two or three to compare.

1 people · 1 sources · 1 viewpoints

Tim Fernholz

Decision models serve as reliable, low-latency workflow steps

Marc Brooker told TechCrunch that decision models could choose the next step in a workflow from a fixed set of answers. He cited confidence scores, lower latency, and potentially lower cost as reasons to use them.

Supporting evidence

Amazon releases its own Jev clone as decision models flood the web | TechCrunch

Original excerpt

“What originally piqued my interest in this class of models was that they make a perfect decider for a workflow step— ‘what is the next thing for me to do here, based on where I am?’” Brooker told TechCrunch. He said it offers customers “a workflow step that can be structured in a way that is more reliable, thanks to the confidence scores, thanks to the closed domain of answers, [and is] lower latency, potentially lower cost.”
Share insightCheck this claim

These are individual perspectives, not a measure of consensus. Source material stays in its original language.