UN THÈME, DANS SON CONTEXTE

workflow integration rationale

Judgments in this source concerning workflow integration rationale. Explorez 1 point de vue avec des éléments tirés de 1 source.

1 personnes · 1 sources · 1 opinions exprimées

Contenu mis à jour:

Explorer les liens ↗

Carte des points de vue

Explorer par personne. Sélectionnez deux ou trois personnes pour les comparer.

1 personnes · 1 sources · 1 opinions exprimées

Tim Fernholz

Decision models serve as reliable, low-latency workflow steps

Marc Brooker told TechCrunch that decision models could choose the next step in a workflow from a fixed set of answers. He cited confidence scores, lower latency, and potentially lower cost as reasons to use them.

Éléments favorables

Amazon releases its own Jev clone as decision models flood the web | TechCrunch

Extrait original

“What originally piqued my interest in this class of models was that they make a perfect decider for a workflow step— ‘what is the next thing for me to do here, based on where I am?’” Brooker told TechCrunch. He said it offers customers “a workflow step that can be structured in a way that is more reliable, thanks to the confidence scores, thanks to the closed domain of answers, [and is] lower latency, potentially lower cost.”
Partager un aperçuVérifier cette affirmation

Il s’agit de points de vue individuels, non d’une mesure du consensus. Le matériel source reste dans sa langue d’origine.