A TOPIC, IN CONTEXT

AI security

Judgments in this source concerning AI security. Explore 1 viewpoint with evidence from 1 source.

1 people · 1 sources · 1 viewpoints

Content updated:

Explore connections ↗

Viewpoint map

Explore by person. Select two or three to compare.

1 people · 1 sources · 1 viewpoints

Jim Swanson

Secure enclaves and vetted-data AI infrastructure

J&J mitigates AI security risks by deploying large and small language models within secure internal enclaves, using only vetted and curated data, restricting public generative AI use via policy, and requiring expert review—from security and architecture teams—for every proposed generative AI use case.

Supporting evidence

Gen AI Present and Future: A Conversation with Jim Swanson, CIO at Johnson & Johnson | Greylock

Original excerpt

To defend against threats, we’ve created secure enclaves within the company for our large and small language models, and use vetted, curated data. Additionally, we created policies that educate our employees on the risks and restrictions around use of public Gen AI and direct them towards use of our internal generative AI application. We also review every proposed Gen AI use case through a process that includes security and architecture experts.
Share insightCheck this claim

These are individual perspectives, not a measure of consensus. Source material stays in its original language.