CONNECTED THINKING

Knowledge atlas

Follow people, viewpoints and their original evidence.

1 people · 1 sources · 1 viewpoints

IN CONTEXT

AI security

Choose a viewpoint. Follow it back to the conversation.

Secure enclaves and vetted-data AI infrastructure

IN CONTEXTAI security1 viewpoints
2025-03-14

Equal sectors are reading positions, not rankings.

Showing 1–1 of 1 viewpoints · Newest sources first

1 / 1

Selected viewpoint

Secure enclaves and vetted-data AI infrastructure

J&J mitigates AI security risks by deploying large and small language models within secure internal enclaves, using only vetted and curated data, restricting public generative AI use via policy, and requiring expert review—from security and architecture teams—for every proposed generative AI use case.

These are individual perspectives, not a measure of consensus. Source material stays in its original language.

Supporting evidence

Gen AI Present and Future: A Conversation with Jim Swanson, CIO at Johnson & Johnson | Greylock

Original excerpt

To defend against threats, we’ve created secure enclaves within the company for our large and small language models, and use vetted, curated data. Additionally, we created policies that educate our employees on the risks and restrictions around use of public Gen AI and direct them towards use of our internal generative AI application. We also review every proposed Gen AI use case through a process that includes security and architecture experts.

Publication dates describe the sources, not changes in belief.