UN TEMA, EN CONTEXTO

latency tolerance in voice interactions

Judgments in this source concerning latency tolerance in voice interactions. Explora 1 punto de vista con evidencias de 1 fuente.

1 personas · 1 fuentes · 1 opiniones expresadas

Contenido actualizado:

Explorar conexiones ↗

Mapa de perspectivas

Explore por persona. Seleccione dos o tres para compararlas.

1 personas · 1 fuentes · 1 opiniones expresadas

Jose Nicholas Francisco

Perceived willingness drops significantly after 600–800 ms of silence

Ratings of perceived willingness drop noticeably at 600 ms and become statistically significant between 700 and 800 ms, based on the 2013 gap-tolerance study by Roberts and Francis.

Evidencia a favor

Voice Agent Function Calling: Real-Time Data Lookup Guide

Extracto original

Ratings of perceived willingness drop off noticeably at 600ms in the classic 2013 gap-tolerance study from Roberts and Francis, and the difference turns statistically significant between 700 and 800ms.
Contexto

Dead air is what the caller hears while your handler works, and it costs you fast. InjectAgentMessage is what covers that silence in the reference pattern.

Compartir informaciónVerificar esta afirmación

Estas son perspectivas individuales, no una medida de consenso. El material fuente permanece en su idioma original.