UN THÈME, DANS SON CONTEXTE

latency tolerance in voice interactions

Judgments in this source concerning latency tolerance in voice interactions. Explorez 1 point de vue avec des éléments tirés de 1 source.

1 personnes · 1 sources · 1 opinions exprimées

Contenu mis à jour:

Explorer les liens ↗

Carte des points de vue

Explorer par personne. Sélectionnez deux ou trois personnes pour les comparer.

1 personnes · 1 sources · 1 opinions exprimées

Jose Nicholas Francisco

Perceived willingness drops significantly after 600–800 ms of silence

Ratings of perceived willingness drop noticeably at 600 ms and become statistically significant between 700 and 800 ms, based on the 2013 gap-tolerance study by Roberts and Francis.

Éléments favorables

Voice Agent Function Calling: Real-Time Data Lookup Guide

Extrait original

Ratings of perceived willingness drop off noticeably at 600ms in the classic 2013 gap-tolerance study from Roberts and Francis, and the difference turns statistically significant between 700 and 800ms.
Contexte

Dead air is what the caller hears while your handler works, and it costs you fast. InjectAgentMessage is what covers that silence in the reference pattern.

Partager un aperçuVérifier cette affirmation

Il s’agit de points de vue individuels, non d’une mesure du consensus. Le matériel source reste dans sa langue d’origine.