Wade Foster

原始摘录

It performs about 40% of the tasks accurately, which is the highest that there is. Now, it's more expensive than, say, something like Gemini 3.7, which is, does pretty good but does it at a fraction of the cost.

Wade Foster·2026年9月17日

此片段未附更多上下文，请阅读原始访谈。

时间点来自所提供的转录稿，尚待媒体回放核对。

原始摘录

humans still very much benefit from visualization of those workflows though. That visualization helps them, uh, verify is this thing doing what I intended it to do? It acts as documentation

Wade Foster·2026年9月17日

此片段未附更多上下文，请阅读原始访谈。

时间点来自所提供的转录稿，尚待媒体回放核对。

原始摘录

for the most part, seat-based pricing is dead or dying. I think it may still make some sense in some small areas, but by and large, when you're, when intelligence is such a core part of these product experiences, I don't see how a fixed seat-based pricing mechanism really makes much sense

Wade Foster·2026年9月17日

此片段未附更多上下文，请阅读原始访谈。

时间点来自所提供的转录稿，尚待媒体回放核对。