nafyi.

A TOPIC, IN CONTEXT

Expected loss versus review cost formula

Judgments in this source concerning Expected loss versus review cost formula. Explore 1 viewpoint with evidence from 1 source.

0 people · 1 sources · 1 viewpoints

Content updated:

Explore connections ↗

Viewpoint map

0 people · 1 sources · 1 viewpoints

Benjamin Chen, Duncan McKeen, Manik Mukherjee, Sara Bolouki

Review is warranted when expected loss exceeds review cost

Human review is economically justified for a decision when the product of error probability and error impact exceeds the cost of review. Work failing this test is a candidate for automation—or exclusion from the pipeline.

In An Agentic World Where Automation Gets Cheap, Which Work Is Worth Routing to a Human?

Supporting evidence

Benjamin Chen, Duncan McKeen, Manik Mukherjee, Sara Bolouki·

In An Agentic World Where Automation Gets Cheap, Which Work Is Worth Routing to a Human?

Original excerpt

P(error) × Impact(error) > Cost(review)
Open original · Paragraph 16 (opens in a new tab)Original text source (opens in a new tab)

These findings reflect the available sources, not an exhaustive or current view.

Original conversations1

ARTICLE

In An Agentic World Where Automation Gets Cheap, Which Work Is Worth Routing to a Human?

Scale Blog