PUBLIC VIEWPOINTS

Daksh Gupta

Interview participant ·

1 interviews · 3 viewpoints · 1 topics

Content updated:

Translations are for reading; original excerpts remain the evidence.

Viewpoints by topic

Attributed viewpoints, ordered by interview date. A snapshot of these conversations, not a definitive statement of someone’s beliefs.

AI products

View this topic
AI products

Rapid growth of AI-generated pull requests

About a quarter of all pull requests reviewed in any given month were completely or largely AI-generated—up from fewer than 1% early last year. Detection used signals including branch names and PR descriptions.

Supporting evidence

Original excerpt

And I came to the result that about a quarter of all the poll requests that Graal was reviewing in any given month were completely or at least largely generated by AI. Then I backtracked this data to the last 12 months and it turns out that this number is growing really fast. In fact, early last year, fewer than 1% of pull requests had any evidence of being completely AI generated.
AI-Generated Code Is Already Competing With Human Code — Daksh Gupta, Greptile

Additional context is not included in this excerpt. Read the original conversation.

Start time comes from the supplied transcript. Playback alignment is awaiting review.

AI products

Revert rates show minimal difference between human and agent PRs

Tracking revert rates as a proxy for bad pull requests found one agent reverted about one per thousand, another 3.5 per thousand, and humans around 2.5 per thousand. There doesn't seem to be a very big difference between the rate at which pull requests were reverted from people versus agents in the study.

Supporting evidence

Original excerpt

Codex PR is reverted about one out of every thousand poll requests. Devon once every three and a half times every thousand poll requests. Humans right in the middle at about two and a half. So there doesn't seem to be very big difference between the rate at which poll requests were reverted from people versus agents in my study.
AI-Generated Code Is Already Competing With Human Code — Daksh Gupta, Greptile

Additional context is not included in this excerpt. Read the original conversation.

Start time comes from the supplied transcript. Playback alignment is awaiting review.

AI products

AI coding agents exhibit distinct qualitative failure patterns

There was significant variation in the types of failures agents produced compared to humans. One agent was one and a half times more likely to produce a SQL injection error than humans, while another was about half as likely to produce an auth bypass issue.

Supporting evidence

Original excerpt

Claude is one and a half times more likely to produce a SQL injection error than humans. Devon is about half as likely as humans to produce a off bypass issue. I found it very interesting that there was this much variation in how these agents were performing and how different their failure modes were from humans.
AI-Generated Code Is Already Competing With Human Code — Daksh Gupta, Greptile

Additional context is not included in this excerpt. Read the original conversation.

Start time comes from the supplied transcript. Playback alignment is awaiting review.

Statements by interview date1

Statements are ordered by the original interview publication date; differences in wording do not establish a change of position.