OPINIONS EXPRIMÉES EN PUBLIC

Jennifer Ferro

Source participant

1 sources · 3 points de vue · 2 sujets

Contenu mis à jour:

Jennifer Ferro sur content strategy, public-private ecosystem design. Explorez 3 points de vue par thème, avec des éléments tirés de 1 source.

Explorer les liens

Points de vue par sujet

Points de vue attribués, classés par date de publication de la source. Un aperçu de ces échanges, sans prétendre définir toutes les convictions de la personne.

Les traductions sont destinées à la lecture ; les extraits originaux restent la source evidence.

content strategy

Voir ce sujet
content strategy

KCRW does not assume public radio must be boring

KCRW does not assume that being public radio means it must be boring.

Éléments favorables

Don’t be boring

Extrait original

We don’t assume, oh, we’re public radio, so we should be a little bit boring.
Jennifer Ferro
Partager un aperçu
content strategy

A preference for “chocolate cake”

Ferro contrasts broccoli with chocolate cake and says KCRW tries to lean toward the chocolate cake.

Éléments favorables

Don’t be boring

Extrait original

There’s the broccoli and the chocolate cake. We try to lean toward the chocolate cake.
Jennifer Ferro
Partager un aperçu

public-private ecosystem design

Voir ce sujet

Bookstores and libraries can coexist

Ferro points to bookstores and libraries as an example of public and private options coexisting, with people choosing based on their needs.

Éléments favorables

Don’t be boring

Extrait original

Yeah, definitely. And I also think that there are lots of things in the world that have public parts and private parts. There’s bookstores and there are libraries, and both coexist really nicely, and people make decisions based on what they need.
Contexte

I don’t know. I don’t want to be a big advocate of government regulation necessarily, but I do feel that our society is better when we have spaces that are designed just to make people’s lives better. That’s it.

Jennifer Ferro
Partager un aperçu

Propos par date de source1

Les propos sont classés par date de publication de la source originale ; une différence de formulation ne prouve pas un changement de position.