AI 挖掘证据；律师负责判断
Harvey 等 AI 工具可挖掘历史合同中的证据，用于比对与验证——但律师仍须判断哪些先例具有可比性，以及这些先例的结果对当前谈判意味着什么。
支持这项说法
将赔偿条款与交易历史进行基准比对 | Harvey
律师仍须决定哪些先例具有参考权重，以及何种立场适用于当前交易。这才是真正的优势所在——关键不在于档案中存有更多赔偿条款，而在于知晓哪些先例对眼前这笔交易真正重要。Harvey 使贵组织的交易历史更易于检索、比对与验证，从而减少律师搜寻先例及识别异常条款所耗时间，使其能将更多精力投入基于可比交易证据的实质性谈判。
原始摘录
The lawyer still decides which precedent deserves weight and which position makes sense for the current deal. This is the real advantage — not simply having more indemnification clauses in your archive, but knowing which precedents matter for the deal in front of you. Harvey makes the organization’s deal history easier to search, compare, and verify, so lawyers spend less time hunting for precedent and identifying unusual positions, and more time negotiating from evidence grounded in comparable transactions.
上下文
贵团队不再仅凭一份旧协议便假定其代表常态，而是可面向一组相关交易样本展开分析，直观查看当前提案所处位置，并核查支撑该比对结论的原始条款文本。 想了解 Harvey 如何助力您的合同流程？请在下方注册预约演示：
原始上下文
Instead of finding one old agreement and assuming it represents the norm, your team can now look across a relevant cohort, see where the current proposal falls, and inspect the source language behind the comparison. Want to see how Harvey can support your contract processes? Sign up for a demo below: