按校准置信度与错误成本触发人工复核
代理与人工工作的边界不应仅由准确率决定，而应基于校准后的置信度，并结合错误引发的财务后果综合评估——该后果需折算为触发人工复核所需的美元金额阈值。
支持这项说法
本文构建的框架依据经校准的置信度定位该边界，该置信度通过错误所引发的财务后果进行评估，并转化为代理触发人工复核的美元金额阈值。
原始摘录
The framework developed here locates the boundary based on calibrated confidence, which is evaluated against the financial consequences of error and converted into a dollar threshold at which the agent would escalate.
上下文
智能体系统降低知识工作成本，从而扩大了值得执行的工作总量，并使战略焦点从“自动化程度”转向“人类判断在其中的部署位置”。该边界无法仅凭准确率确定，因为人工复核的价值取决于错误发生的概率及其后果。结果是一种将人类注意力导向其创造最大价值之决策的系统，而非采用统一的复核阈值。
原始上下文
The reduction in the cost of knowledge work produced by agentic systems expands the volume of work worth performing and shifts the strategic question from the extent of automation to the placement of human judgment within it. This boundary cannot be determined by accuracy alone, because the value of human review depends on both the probability of an error and the consequence of that error. The result is a system that directs human attention toward the decisions in which it creates the greatest value, rather than applying a uniform review threshold.