金融工作流支持以美元为基础设定人工审核阈值
在金融领域——尤其是信用回收环节——决策价值与人工审核时间成本均可折算为美元，从而可量化判断人工审核是否具备经济合理性；而受监管或政策强制要求的决策，则依固定规则执行，不进行成本定价。
支持这项说法
双方成本均已折算为美元，因此人工复核值得介入的临界点可直接确定。
原始摘录
Both sides are already denominated in dollars, so the boundary at which human review becomes worthwhile can be set directly.
上下文
金融领域常属此类，尤其是信用催收场景：一笔欠款要么被成功收回，要么未被收回；一名分析师的一小时要么花在某张账单上，要么花在另一张上。并非所有决策都符合这一逻辑。例如，首席财务官（CFO）对季度财报签字确认，是出于法律强制要求，而非因其复核是发现错误的最低成本方式；该流程中部分决策还受监管规定、内部政策或供应商协议约束，此类情形须按规则执行，而非按成本定价。
原始上下文
Finance is often such a domain, particularly credit recovery. A credit is either recovered or it is not, and an analyst’s hour is either spent on one statement or another. Not every decision works this way. A CFO certifies quarterly statements because the law requires it, not because their review is the cheapest way to catch an error, and some decisions inside this workflow are similarly governed by regulation, internal policy, or the vendor relationship. Those are handled as rules rather than priced.