合同条件逻辑需语义理解
合同包含复杂的条件逻辑：条款跨多页、相互引用，并描述依赖上下文的触发条件。AI 智能体必须理解其含义和后果——而不仅是匹配字词——从而区分句法差异与语义差异。
支持这项说法
将 Playbook 审查重构为多智能体系统｜Harvey
合同具有复杂的条件逻辑，条款跨越多页、相互引用，并描述某些条件何时被触发以及何时不被触发。而且即使在创建了谈判准则之后，对方的合同也几乎永远不会使用你准则中的确切措辞。立场往往受到条件逻辑的限定。因此，审查条款的智能体需要理解这些条件性、句法与语义差异的含义和影响，而不是进行词语匹配。
原始摘录
Contracts have complex conditional logic and clauses span pages, reference each other, and describe when certain conditions are triggered and not. And even after creating a playbook, a counterparty’s contract will almost never use your playbook’s exact words. Positions are often qualified with conditional logic. An agent reviewing a clause, therefore, requires comprehending meaning and repercussions of these conditional, syntatic vs semantic differences instead of word matching.
上下文
合同包含复杂的条件逻辑：
原始上下文
Contracts include complex conditional logic: