交易历史是更优的基准
组织自身谈判达成的赔偿条款历史比通用条款库包含更多相关信号：它反映了该组织内部实际的风险分配模式、交易对手的反对点以及最终谈判结果。
支持这项说法
将赔偿条款与交易历史进行基准比对 | Harvey
贵团队可能已就数百项赔偿条款开展过谈判。该历史记录往往比通用条款库更具参考价值，因为它真实呈现了贵组织自身如何分配风险、交易对手方曾在哪些方面提出异议，以及类似谈判最终达成的结果。
原始摘录
Your team may already have negotiated hundreds of indemnification clauses. That history often contains more relevant signals than a generic clause library because it shows how your own organization has allocated risk, where counterparties have pushed back, and where comparable negotiations ultimately landed.
上下文
然而，当这些协议分散存于各类案件文件夹及文档库中时，将其用作基准比对可能需耗费数小时进行检索、阅读，并手动将条款录入电子表格。Vault 作为中央枢纽，可统一维护并查询先例，而审阅表则可在多份文档集中结构化呈现可比交易要点。
原始上下文
However, when those agreements are scattered across matter folders and document repositories, using them as a benchmark can require hours of searching, reading, and manually entering terms into a spreadsheet. Vault acts as a central hub that maintains and queries precedent, while review tables structure comparable deal points across document sets.