公开观点
Source author ·
1 场访谈 · 3 条观点 · 3 个话题内容更新于:
探索知识关联 ↗译文仅辅助阅读；核查观点请以原始摘录为准。
按访谈日期排序的归属观点。这是相关对话的快照，而非对某人信念的最终定论。
Moura argues that the gap between mapped AI use cases and shipped work requires a governed layer from day one.
支持这项说法
原始摘录
Your company mapped 100 AI use cases and will ship 10. Maybe. That gap is a curse, and it only breaks free with a governed layer from day one.The People Who Understand Don't Build. The People Who Build Don't Understand. | CrewAI
此片段未附更多上下文，请阅读原始访谈。
位置来自原始文本；请结合原文语境核对措辞与归属。
Moura calls the cost of crossing from the person who understands the work to the person who can implement it the 'translation tax' in AI projects.
支持这项说法
原始摘录
At the big company, that cost had a name nobody said out loud: alignment. Alignment, alignment, T&E, training. In the move between countries, it has a different name: documents, and then more documents. In AI projects, it has a name I only learned after joining CrewAI. The translation tax.The People Who Understand Don't Build. The People Who Build Don't Understand. | CrewAI
此片段未附更多上下文，请阅读原始访谈。
位置来自原始文本；请结合原文语境核对措辞与归属。
Moura describes CrewAI Studio as letting the person who understands the business build on a visual canvas while the engineer exports clean, readable code that can be reviewed, versioned, and extended. Both work on the same reusable blocks.
支持这项说法
原始摘录
Studio does not force the choice. The person who understands the business builds on a visual canvas, with blocks and connectors that already exist. The engineer exports clean, readable code, not a machine-generated black box. Code you can review, version, and extend. Both sides work on the same reusable blocks, so nothing starts from zero.The People Who Understand Don't Build. The People Who Build Don't Understand. | CrewAI
This is what convinced me to cross over to CrewAI.
位置来自原始文本；请结合原文语境核对措辞与归属。
按原始访谈发布日期排列；表述不同不代表立场发生变化。
nafyi.