UN THÈME, DANS SON CONTEXTE

performance benchmarking

Judgments in this source concerning performance benchmarking. Explorez 2 points de vue avec des éléments tirés de 2 sources.

0 personnes · 2 sources · 2 opinions exprimées

Contenu mis à jour:

Explorer les liens ↗

Carte des points de vue

0 personnes · 2 sources · 2 opinions exprimées

Compass improved accuracy by 14–16 points on financial RAG workload

On the High Finance benchmark—a Cohere-built investment-banking RAG workload—Compass improved accuracy by 14–16 points over Azure Search (64.8 → 81.1). That gap can distinguish between unsatisfactory and great end-user answers.

Éléments favorables

Compass is coming to the cloud | Cohere

Extrait original

The figure below is one instance of the accuracy gain over traditional or standalone search infrastructure on a representative financial-industry RAG workload: embed a query, retrieve presentation materials from an index, and score the top results. On High Finance, a Cohere-built investment-banking benchmark, Compass achieved a 14-16 point improvement on Azure Search (from 64.8 to 81.1). A gap of this size can be the difference between an unsatisfactory answer and a great one for the end user.

Faster batch execution in one crawl, with a measurement caveat

In one 50-action Wikipedia crawl reported by the authors, batch execution took 14,221.7 ms and Playwright took 22,650.3 ms, a 1.59x difference. Both completed all 50 actions. The authors stress that this was one run on one route from one client, rather than a benchmark.

Éléments favorables

Introducing Stagehand v4: The SDK for browser agents.

Extrait original

We measured one 50-action Wikipedia crawl. Batch finished in 14,221.7ms against Playwright's 22,650.3ms, and both completed 50 of 50 actions. That works out to 3.52 actions per second versus 2.21, a 1.59x difference, with 44.0ms of overhead for the outer batch call.

Ces résultats reflètent les sources disponibles, sans constituer une vue exhaustive ou à jour.