Thèmes / Création d'entreprises

Point de vue attribué · Pas une citation directe

Good decisions can still face unfavorable outcomes

Tarek Mansour uses poker players as an analogy for accepting variance: a player can believe a hand is good, lose, and still maintain the same approach.

Derrière ce point de vue

Les traductions sont destinées à la lecture ; les extraits originaux restent la source evidence.

Kalshi’s Tarek Mansour vs. the Federal Government

Extrait original

But the key learning with that, what’s interesting is it’s a little bit like poker, the best poker players, they know when they’re playing a good hand and they’re okay with the variance.
Contexte

No, I think, but people lost confidence. It’s like, we should pivot, and it’s the wrong strategy, wrong strategy, wrong execution, all of that. We’re not doing a good job, basically. It’s on us. And it’s fine. You should hold the founders accountable. They can lose a lot, but they’ll stick to their game. And then they know that over time the variance is gonna come back and with enough plays they’re gonna win over time. And you’ll see with Elon, you’ll see with some of these founders that can take these extreme risks as long as they know their expected outcome and they can intake the variance over time.

Ouvrir l’épisode et rechercher à 44:21.

L’heure de début provient de la transcription fournie. L’alignement avec la lecture est en attente de révision.