CONNECTED THINKING
Knowledge atlas
Follow people, viewpoints and their original evidence.
1 people · 1 sources · 1 viewpoints
IN CONTEXT
function selection accuracy
Choose a viewpoint. Follow it back to the conversation.
Tool count degrades selection accuracy: 98% at 10 tools → 88% at 100
Equal sectors are reading positions, not rankings.
Showing 1–1 of 1 viewpoints · Newest sources first
Selected viewpoint
Tool count degrades selection accuracy: 98% at 10 tools → 88% at 100
The HumanMCP study measured a decline in function selection accuracy from 98% with 10 tools to 88% with 100 tools.
These are individual perspectives, not a measure of consensus. Source material stays in its original language.
Supporting evidence
Original excerpt
The HumanMCP study measured a drop from 98% at 10 tools to 88% at 100.
Context
When the toolset grows, selection accuracy falls. Add functions one at a time and re-check selection accuracy after each. One lookup, three failure lines, and a filler function make a complete first release.
Publication dates describe the sources, not changes in belief.