CONNECTED THINKING

Knowledge atlas

Follow people, viewpoints and their original evidence.

1 people · 1 sources · 1 viewpoints

IN CONTEXT

agent architecture

Choose a viewpoint. Follow it back to the conversation.

An LLM in a for-loop with tools and memory

IN CONTEXTagent architecture1 viewpoints
2026-08-20

Equal sectors are reading positions, not rankings.

Showing 1–1 of 1 viewpoints · Newest sources first

1 / 1

Selected viewpoint

An LLM in a for-loop with tools and memory

Maarten Grootendorst defines an agent as an LLM running in a for-loop with tools, memory, and optionally guardrails.

These are individual perspectives, not a measure of consensus. Source material stays in its original language.

Supporting evidence

An Agent Is Just an LLM in a For-Loop

Original excerpt

That’s actually been one of the more complex topics for us to define, because the field changes so quickly. What fundamentally is an agent when the definition shifts every two months? It’s a bit of a hot take, but I really do think an agent is an LLM in a for-loop with some tools, some memory, and perhaps some guardrails. When you boil it all down, that’s essentially it.
Context

Maarten Grootendorst:

Publication dates describe the sources, not changes in belief.